Marine accident and incident investigation: best practice
How can Harbour Authorities, and owners of marine facilities, learn from marine accidents or incidents to help prevent reoccurrence?
Read articleWhat are the benefits of reviewing vessel and traffic navigational aids, and what makes a quality review?
In port operations, safety and efficiency are key. Aids to Navigation (AtoN) are devices, systems or services external to vessels, designed to enhance the safe and efficient navigation of vessels and traffic, such as lighthouses, buoys, and beacons.
Harbour Authorities (especially including Statutory Harbour Authorities) bear the responsibility of maintaining navigational aids crucial for vessel safety within their jurisdiction. Under the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 and Port Marine Safety Code, Harbour Authorities are usually also designated as Local Lighthouse Authorities who must review their AtoN every five years. This review aligns with a need to conduct Formal Safety Assessments to enhance port operations.
For these authorities, maintaining effective AtoN is not only a regulatory duty, but a critical aspect of safeguarding maritime interests. In an era of evolving regulations, policies, and increasing maritime traffic, optimising AtoN has never been more crucial.
In light of the duty and importance of undertaking regular AtoN reviews, what are the benefits of a quality review, and what makes a quality review?
Optimising AtoN offers significant cost-saving potential. By repositioning or decommissioning redundant aids, authorities can reduce maintenance costs and allocate resources more effectively. Enhancing AtoN accuracy and reliability minimises the risk of maritime incidents, leading to savings in accident mitigation and response.
Strategic repositioning or removal of unnecessary AtoN reduces the frequency and scope of maintenance activities, leading to significant savings in labour, equipment, and resources. This occurs as AtoN locations are gradually built-up overtime if the system as a whole is not reviewed, meaning that previously placed AtoN such as special marks, channel buoys, or lateral marks on infrastructure, may no longer serve their intended purpose from when they were originally commissioned.
Improved placement of AtoN reduces vessel incident risks and associated costs of vessel repairs and environmental cleanup efforts. In some ports, especially those in estuarine environments, there can be significant shift in the bathymetric properties of the navigable water, outside of the main channels which are usually dredged. These shifts can result in the original placement of AtoN becoming less helpful over time, and in some cases, the AtoN can start to impede the passage of vessels.
Redirecting resources from redundant AtoN to critical areas enhances navigational aid effectiveness and optimises resource utilisation. In some cases, it may well be better to consider the use of a single isolated danger mark, rather than relying on a series of cardinal marks which can confuse mariners as to where the danger is relative to the shore or areas of shoaling.
Strategic assessments allow informed decisions on investments in new technologies or infrastructure upgrades, minimising lifecycle costs associated with AtoN maintenance and replacement. In some cases, ports initially opt for a sector light, which tends to require more maintenance than AtoN, which are structurally simpler. In this case, some ports find that well positioned leading lights can significantly reduce the costs they incur in place of using sector lights when guiding vessels through their main navigable channels.
Adhering to best practices and regulatory requirements mitigates the risk of non-compliance penalties and legal liabilities, ultimately leading to cost savings.
Proactive AtoN assessments and improvements build stakeholder confidence and trust, leading to indirect cost savings through improved reputation and increased support for funding initiatives.
There are a number of considerations to ensure an optimised, efficient AtoN review that will fully reap the benefits explored above.
A quality AtoN review should:
Optimising Aids to Navigation is a strategic opportunity for Harbour Authorities and Local Lighthouse Authorities. Ensuring compliance with industry standards and enhancing operational efficiency enables authorities to confidently navigate the complexities of maritime safety.
ABPmer’s maritime specialists regularly assist authorities in unlocking the benefits of compliance and efficiency, charting a course towards safer seas and more cost-effective operations.
Our consultancy delivers a comprehensive solution tailored to meet the stringent requirements set forth by regulatory bodies such as the Port Marine Safety Code and General Lighthouse Authorities, providing quality insights and recommendations to empower Harbour Authorities to make informed decisions to help reduce maintenance costs, promote efficient vessel passage, and ensure compliance with industry standards.
Prepared by Tim Aldridge, ABPmer Senior Maritime Consultant
As specialists in maritime risk assessment, we recognise that zero risk is rarely achievable. However, through careful examination and risk control measures, such as AtoN provision, our experienced consultants work closely with you to reduce or maintain navigation risk at acceptable levels, supporting safe, efficient operations at your port.
Ready to discuss your requirements? Get in touch.
How can Harbour Authorities, and owners of marine facilities, learn from marine accidents or incidents to help prevent reoccurrence?
Read articleRecommended by the PMSC, annual internal audits provide assurance that an MSMS is fit for purpose. How can organisations ensure their audits are effective?
Read articleOur Briefing Note outlines the essential aspects of a PMSC-compliant Marine Safety Management System and provides tips on good practice.
Read article